Ohio State is in the process of revising websites and program materials to accurately reflect compliance with the law. While this work occurs, language referencing protected class status or other activities prohibited by Ohio Senate Bill 1 may still appear in some places. However, all programs and activities are being administered in compliance with federal and state law.

Department Colloquium: Justin Clarke-Doane

JCD
April 12, 2019
All Day
347 University Hall

Realism, Objectivity, and Evaluation


I will discuss Benacerraf's epistemological challenge for realism about an area, F, like mathematics, metalogic, modality, or morality. I will argue that it should be understood as the challenge to show that our beliefs are safe, realistically construed -- i.e., as the challenge to show that we could not have easily had systematically false ones.  I will explain how F-pluralism -- the view that there are a plurality of F-like concepts, all independently satisfied -- can be understood as a response to Benacerraf's challenge.  And I will show that moral, and more generally, normative pluralism is peculiarly unsatisfactory.  One upshot of the discussion is a radicalization of Moore's Open Question Argument.  Another is that the concepts of realism and objectivity, which are widely identified, are actually in tension.

Justin Clarke-Doane is an Assistant Professor at Columbia University.